From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crawford v. Chicago Title Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-03153-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-03153-JAM-KJN

09-16-2011

ELENA CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY, KAREN BRENNEN, GREG FARR, and DOES 1-20, Defendants.

PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON, LLP Christopher F. Wohl, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants THE ROSA LAW GROUP Andrea Rosa, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff


Christopher F. Wohl, SBN: 170280

Nicole Legrottaglie, SBN: 271416

PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY,

KAREN BRENNEN and

GREG FARR

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY

THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

ORDER

Judge: John A. Mendez

WHEREAS, on November 12, 2010, the Court granted Defendants' unopposed motion to continue the trial date and modify the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order ("Scheduling Order") extending several deadlines including the deadline for completion of discovery to March 15, 2011.

WHEREAS, on February 28, 2011, the parties further agreed to modify the Scheduling Order extending the discovery deadline to April 15, 2011. The Court approved the stipulation on February 28, 2011.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint dismissing certain claims and parties and added claims.

WHEREAS, on June 16, 2011, the parties further agreed to modify the Scheduling Order extending the discovery deadline to August 12, 2011. The Court approved the stipulation on June 17, 2011.

Defendants agree to make Cynthia Hawkins available for her deposition by video conference pursuant to FRCP Rule 30(b) (4) on September 23, 2011 at a time agreeable to the parties. It is agreed that Plaintiff will pay all costs associated with the deposition including the cost of the video conference. Plaintiff also agrees to withdraw her Motion to Extend Discovery Cutoff and vacate the October 5, 2011 hearing. Based on the these stipulations, the parties agree to modify the Scheduling Order by allowing for the completion of Ms. Hawkins' deposition and ask that the Court approve this modification.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON, LLP

Christopher F. Wohl, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants

THE ROSA LAW GROUP

Andrea Rosa, Esq.

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Upon the agreement of the parties hereto, and Good Cause appearing

IT IS SO ORDERED.

John A. Mendez

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Crawford v. Chicago Title Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 16, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-03153-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Crawford v. Chicago Title Co.

Case Details

Full title:ELENA CRAWFORD, Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY, KAREN BRENNEN, GREG…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 16, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-03153-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2011)