From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craver v. Hasty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 15, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-1344 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1344 MCE KJN P

04-15-2012

ANDRE CRAVER, Plaintiff, v. J. HASTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 2, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 2, 2012 (ECF No. 35), are ADOPTED in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 33) is DENIED.

___________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Craver v. Hasty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 15, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-1344 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Craver v. Hasty

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE CRAVER, Plaintiff, v. J. HASTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 15, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1344 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2012)