From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craver v. Hasty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1344 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1344 KJN P

08-10-2011

ANDRE CRAVER, Plaintiff, v. J. HASTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 1, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 14) is denied.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

crav1344.31


Summaries of

Craver v. Hasty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1344 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Craver v. Hasty

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE CRAVER, Plaintiff, v. J. HASTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1344 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)