From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craver v. Floyd

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 15, 2023
2:20-cv-02327 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02327 WBS DB P

02-15-2023

ANDRE RAMON CRAVER, Plaintiff, v. C. FLOYD, Defendant.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 10, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 16.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 10, 2021 (ECF No. 16), are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for judicial intervention (ECF No. 12) is denied; and

3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings.


Summaries of

Craver v. Floyd

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 15, 2023
2:20-cv-02327 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Craver v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE RAMON CRAVER, Plaintiff, v. C. FLOYD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 15, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-02327 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2023)