From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cravens v. Choate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Mar 26, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-0119 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-0119

03-26-2013

James Cravens, Plaintiff, v. Tony Choate, Faye Smith, Dan Harding, Mark Parsons and Greg Hicks, Defendants


Judge Sharp

Magistrate Judge Knowles


DENIAL OF ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Pending is Plaintiff's Motion/Petition for Default Judgment and Status of Case against Defendants (Docket Entry No. 13). The motion for default is denied for the reasons stated below.

Defendant Faye Smith filed an Answer on March 19, 2013 and default is inappropriate against her. Defendants Choate, Harding, Parsons, and Hicks filed a Motion for Extension of Time (Docket Entry No. 14) on March 21, 2103 and on March 22, 2013, the Court granted Defendants' motion (Docket Entry No. 15). Defendants were given until April 19, 2013, to respond to the Complaint against them. Accordingly, the Clerk declines to enter default. Plaintiff's motion is denied.

_____________________

Keith Throckmorton

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Cravens v. Choate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Mar 26, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-0119 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Cravens v. Choate

Case Details

Full title:James Cravens, Plaintiff, v. Tony Choate, Faye Smith, Dan Harding, Mark…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-0119 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 26, 2013)