From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crape v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2006
2:04-cv-1004-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2006)

Opinion

2:04-cv-1004-GEB-GGH-P.

October 3, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 1, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 1, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Crape v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2006
2:04-cv-1004-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Crape v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL KEITH CRAPE, Petitioner, v. TERESA A. SCHWARTZ, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 3, 2006

Citations

2:04-cv-1004-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2006)

Citing Cases

Lutge v. Moore

Thus, the state court decision here necessarily incorporated both state and federal constitutional principles…