From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Mar 24, 2020
597 S.W.3d 435 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107539

03-24-2020

Gregory CRANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

For Appellant: Katharine P. Curry, 1000 W. Nifong Blvd., Bldg. 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203. For Respondent: Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.


For Appellant: Katharine P. Curry, 1000 W. Nifong Blvd., Bldg. 7, Ste. 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

For Respondent: Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM Gregory Crane appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Crane alleges that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because his guilty plea was involuntary and unknowing in that he was misadvised that if he received a prison sentence he would not also have to pay restitution.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Crane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Mar 24, 2020
597 S.W.3d 435 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Crane v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gregory CRANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Mar 24, 2020

Citations

597 S.W.3d 435 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)