From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. Schreiber

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 11, 2013
114 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 5D12–1598.

2013-01-11

Mary Lauder CRANE f/k/a Mary E. Lauder, Appellant, v. Kathleen SCHREIBER, as Personal, etc., Appellee.

Non–Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, John Dean Moxley, Jr., Judge. Tino Gonzalez, Melbourne, for Appellant. Michele L. Lieberman, of Law Office of Michele L. Lieberman, Inverness, for Appellee.


Non–Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, John Dean Moxley, Jr., Judge.
Tino Gonzalez, Melbourne, for Appellant. Michele L. Lieberman, of Law Office of Michele L. Lieberman, Inverness, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

See Guntner v. Jennings, 980 So.2d 1185, 1188 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (holding that without transcript or stipulated statement of facts, appellate court “cannot second-guess the factual basis for a forum non conveniens transfer”).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crane v. Schreiber

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 11, 2013
114 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Crane v. Schreiber

Case Details

Full title:Mary Lauder CRANE f/k/a Mary E. Lauder, Appellant, v. Kathleen SCHREIBER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

114 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)