Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Crane v. Samples

267 Ga. App. 895 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Crane v. Samples

10 Citing cases

  1. Crane v. Poteat

    282 Ga. App. 182 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)

    Crane v. Poteat.Crane v. Samples, 267 Ga. App. 895 ( 600 SE2d 624) (2004).Crane v. Cheeley, 270 Ga. App. 126 ( 605 SE2d 824) (2004).

  2. Crane v. Poteat

    275 Ga. App. 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 5 times

    That amendment applies to criminal prosecutions, and, as Crane's suit was a civil proceeding, this enumeration has no merit. U.S. Const., Amend. 6. Crane v. Samples;Kraft v. Adams.Crane v. Samples, 267 Ga. App. 895, 896 (1) ( 600 SE2d 624) (2004).Kraft v. Adams, 248 Ga. App. 141, 145 (3) ( 545 SE2d 69) (2001).

  3. Bankston v. RES-GA Twelve, LLC

    334 Ga. App. 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 8 times

    The trial court correctly concluded that because the primary claims must be dismissed, the derivative claims for punitive damages and litigation costs also fail. See Crane v. Samples, 267 Ga.App. 895, 896(2), 600 S.E.2d 624 (2004).Judgment affirmed.

  4. Leone v. Servicing

    311 Ga. App. 702 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that "[i]t is the duty of a litigant to obtain a ruling on his motions or objections" (punctuation omitted)

    (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Crane v. Samples, 267 Ga.App. 895, 896(2), 600 S.E.2d 624 (2004). Accord Hallisy, supra at 129(3), 464 S.E.2d 219 (Although the right to a trial by jury exists in dispossessory actions, “[t]he existence of the right does not demand that a jury trial be held in all cases, including those where no issues remain for jury determination.

  5. Leone v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC

    311 Ga. App. 702 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 9 times

    (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Crane v. Samples, 267 Ga. App. 895, 896 (2) ( 600 S.E.2d 624) (2004). Accord Hallisy, supra at 129 (3) (Although the right to a trial by jury exists in disposesssory actions, "[t]he existence of the right does not demand that a jury trial be held in all cases, including those where no issues remain for jury determination.

  6. Cuyler v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    284 Ga. App. 409 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 10 times

    Crane v. Poteat, 275 Ga. App. 669, 670 (2) ( 621 SE2d 501) (2005).Crane v. Samples, 267 Ga. App. 895, 896 (2) ( 600 SE2d 624) (2004).Souder v. Webb, 198 Ga. App. 419, 420 ( 401 SE2d 630) (1991).

  7. Crane v. Lazaro

    281 Ga. App. 127 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 9 times

    This is not the first time Crane has been fined for filing a frivolous appeal. See Crane v. Poteat, supra, 275 Ga. App. at 671 (3); Crane u. Samples, 267 Ga. App. 895 ( 600 SE2d 624) (2004). BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

  8. Crane v. State Farm Insurance Company

    278 Ga. App. 655 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 8 times

    This is not the first time Crane has filed a pro se lawsuit and then appealed a lower court's ruling, contending he was deprived of his constitutional rights. See Crane v. Poteat, 275 Ga. App. 669 ( 621 SE2d 501) (2005); Crane v. Cheeley, 270 Ga. App. 126 ( 605 SE2d 824) (2004); Crane v. Darnell, 268 Ga. App. 311 ( 601 SE2d 726) (2004); Crane v. Samples, 267 Ga. App. 895 ( 600 SE2d 624) (2004); Crane v. Albertelli, 264 Ga. App. 910 ( 592 SE2d 684) (2003). The record shows that Crane was involved in a car accident with Wardrup on January 2, 2003. Crane filed suit against State Farm on August 20, 2004, alleging that State Farm was liable for Wardrup's negligence.

  9. Steele v. Atlanta Maternal-Fetal Medicine

    271 Ga. App. 622 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming discretionary exclusion of "emotionally provocative" and "inflammatory" photographs of stillborn fetus on grounds that their "slight probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice"

    See also Huff v. State, 239 Ga. App. 83, 87-88 (3) ( 519 SE2d 263) (1999) (accord). See Pulliam v. Balkcom, 245 Ga. 99 (1) ( 263 SE2d 123) (1980) (Sixth Amendment protections do not apply in civil actions); Crane v. Samples, 267 Ga. App. 895, 896 (1) ( 600 SE2d 624) (2004) (accord). See also Herringdine v. Nalley Equip. Leasing, 238 Ga. App. 210-211 (1) ( 517 SE2d 571) (1999) (physical precedent only) (recognizing the purpose of the Civil Practice Act to promote and not to obstruct the administration of justice and thus enable the court to do substantial justice).

  10. Crane v. Samples

    544 U.S. 927 (2005)

    Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 267 Ga. App. 895, 600 S. E. 2d 624.