From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 2, 2023
2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2023)

Opinion

2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN

01-02-2023

RICHARD J. CRANE, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 27, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. On October 14, 2022, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file objections. (ECF No. 313.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 320.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 27, 2022, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 281) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Crane v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 2, 2023
2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Crane v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD J. CRANE, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 2, 2023

Citations

2:15-cv-00208-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2023)