From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 4, 2021
2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)

Opinion

2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P

06-04-2021

RICHARD J. CRANE, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 27, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment filed on May 7, 2021. In the meantime, defendant Weeks filed a motion for summary judgment on May 21, 2021. Because it is likely plaintiff will need additional time to respond to defendant Weeks' motion as well, and plaintiff has limited access to the law library, plaintiff is granted sixty days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to both motions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 236, 240.)

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 242) is granted; and
2. Plaintiff is granted sixty days from the date of this order in which to file a response to both motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 236, 240).


Summaries of

Crane v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 4, 2021
2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Crane v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD J. CRANE, Plaintiff, v. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 4, 2021

Citations

2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)