From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crane v. Annucci

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 16, 2024
23-CV-6912 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-6912 (LTS)

01-16-2024

MICHAEL A. CRANE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER ANTHONY ANNUCCI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge.

By order dated October 4, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff 60 days' leave to file an amended complaint. On November 20, 2023, following Plaintiff's request for an extension of time, the Court granted him an additional 30 days to file an amended pleading. The October 4, 2023 order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this action.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crane v. Annucci

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 16, 2024
23-CV-6912 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Crane v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. CRANE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER ANTHONY ANNUCCI, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 16, 2024

Citations

23-CV-6912 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2024)