From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crandell v. Schutz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1992
188 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 28, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The record does not support the appellant's contention that the instant lawsuit was commenced against him "frivolous[ly]", as that word is defined in 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c), or that the action constituted an extortionate abuse of process. In consequence, his application that sanctions be imposed on the plaintiff's counsel for frivolous conduct in civil litigation was properly denied. Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, O'Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crandell v. Schutz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1992
188 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Crandell v. Schutz

Case Details

Full title:LENORA CRANDELL, Respondent, v. ROBERT N. SCHUTZ, Appellant, et al…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

Yonkers Contracting v. Pt. Auth. Trans-Hudson

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was for the imposition of…

McDonald v. Colonial Steel Corp.

That branch of plaintiffs' application which seeks a conditional order determining that they are entitled to…