From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crandell v. Saul

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
1:20-cv-1444 JLT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-1444 JLT

07-06-2021

WILIAM CURTIS CRANDELL, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER REMANDING THE MATTER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(G)

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, WILLIAM CURTIS CRANDELL, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On July 6, 2021, the parties stipulated to a voluntary remand pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. 17.) Pursuant to the terms of the stipulation, an ALJ shall issue a new decision. (Id. at 1.) Further, the parties stipulated that judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff. (Id.) Based upon the terms of the stipulation, the Court ORDERS:

1. The matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and
2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff William Curtis Crandell and against Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crandell v. Saul

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 6, 2021
1:20-cv-1444 JLT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Crandell v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:WILIAM CURTIS CRANDELL, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-1444 JLT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2021)