From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crampton v. Normandy Apartments

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jun 30, 2005
No. 02-05-058-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2005)

Opinion

No. 02-05-058-CV

Delivered: June 30, 2005.

Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Wichita County.

PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On May 26, 2005, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Crampton v. Normandy Apartments

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jun 30, 2005
No. 02-05-058-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2005)
Case details for

Crampton v. Normandy Apartments

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA CRAMPTON, Appellant v. NORMANDY APARTMENTS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jun 30, 2005

Citations

No. 02-05-058-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2005)