From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crames v. Wonderknit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 1983
92 A.D.2d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

March 7, 1983


In an action on a contract, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), entered July 12, 1982, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order modified, on the law, by adding thereto after the word "denied" the following, "except that the motion is granted to the extent of striking the fourth cause of action from the complaint, and the claim for damages in the first cause of action is reduced to $135,000." As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We have reduced the claim for damages in the first cause of action in accordance with the parties' stipulation. We have dismissed the fourth cause of action since no separate cause lies for punitive damages. Damiani, J.P., Mangano, Thompson and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crames v. Wonderknit Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 1983
92 A.D.2d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Crames v. Wonderknit Corporation

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CRAMES, Respondent, v. WONDERKNIT CORPORATION et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1983

Citations

92 A.D.2d 857 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

In re Argo Communications Corp.

Centel argues that the punitive damages claim should be dismissed because there is no independent cause of…

Cree v. Cree

In the absence of a meritorious defense or reasonable excuse for the delay, Special Term abused its…