From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cramer v. Vill. of Oakley

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 5, 2017
500 Mich. 964 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154209 COA: 330736

04-05-2017

Brandi CRAMER f/k/a Brandi Bitterman, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF OAKLEY, Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE as moot Part III of the Court of Appeals opinion, see 316 Mich. App. 726, ––– n. 1, –––– n. 7 (2016), and we REMAND this case to the Shiawassee Circuit Court for dismissal of the plaintiff's Freedom of Information Act claims. See Federated Publications, Inc. v. Lansing , 467 Mich. 98, 101 (2002). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court. Thus, the award of attorney fees, costs, and disbursements remains vacated.


Summaries of

Cramer v. Vill. of Oakley

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 5, 2017
500 Mich. 964 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

Cramer v. Vill. of Oakley

Case Details

Full title:Brandi CRAMER f/k/a Brandi Bitterman, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Apr 5, 2017

Citations

500 Mich. 964 (Mich. 2017)
892 N.W.2d 371

Citing Cases

Tooles Contracting Grp. v. Washtenaw Cnty. Rd. Comm'n

Thus, there was nothing left to resolve as to the motion for summary disposition. See Cramer v Village of…