From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cramer v. Dickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2008
CV F 08 0375 AWI WMW PC (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2008)

Opinion

CV F 08 0375 AWI WMW PC.

May 23, 2008


ORDER


On April 30, 2008, the court recommended dismissal of this action for Plaintiff's failure to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis as directed by the March 19, 2008, order. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff indicates that she was out to court, and did not receive the March 19, 2008, order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The April 30, 2008, recommendation of dismissal is vacated.

2. The Clerk's Office is directed to re-serve the March 19, 2008, order, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis, upon Plaintiff.

3. Plaintiff shall, within thirty days of the date of service of this order, complete and submit to the court an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cramer v. Dickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2008
CV F 08 0375 AWI WMW PC (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Cramer v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:LATANYA CRAMER, Plaintiff, v. S. DICKINSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 23, 2008

Citations

CV F 08 0375 AWI WMW PC (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2008)