Opinion
September 27, 1939.
Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We disregard the convenience of six of defendants' proposed witnesses who, according to defendants' affidavits filed in support of the motion, will testify as experts. ( Seafir v. Shutts, 190 App. Div. 518; Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co., 88 id. 57, 59.) The defendants have failed to establish that the convenience of a greater number of material witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by the change of venue sought. All concur. (The order denies a motion for change of venue.