From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 13, 1996
675 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1996)

Opinion

No. 86709.

June 13, 1996.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal; Certified Great Public Importance; First District; Case No. 95-1588.

Alex Lancaster and Amy L. Sergent of Lancaster and Eure, P.A., Sarasota, and Claire Hamner Matturro, Cairo, Georgia, for Petitioner.

James G. Trope and Elizabeth J. Muller of Florida Employers Insurance Service Corporation, Sarasota, for Respondents.

Edward A. Dion, General Counsel and David C. Hawkins, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Intervenor, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Workers' Compensation.


We have for review Cramer v. Brodell Plumbing Co., 661 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), wherein the district court certified:

Whether section [ 440.15 (3)(b)4.d.], Florida Statutes (1991), is subject to and comports with the requirements of Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3 (b)(4), Fla. Const. We have already answered in the affirmative. See Barry v. Burdines, 675 So.2d 587 (Fla. 1996). We approve Cramer.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 13, 1996
675 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1996)
Case details for

Cramer v. Broedell Plumbing Supply

Case Details

Full title:EARL L. CRAMER, PETITIONER, v. BROEDELL PLUMBING SUPPLY, ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 13, 1996

Citations

675 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1996)

Citing Cases

Cramer v. State of Florida

Although the complaint Cramer and Kessler filed does not inform us of the Division's disposition of their…