From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-0225 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-0225

08-06-2012

CLINTON E. CRAKER and DANA M. CRAKER, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 6 day of August, 2 012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's Motion in Limine Regarding Unsubstantiated Injuries [Doc. No. 91] and plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Any and All Evidence Regarding the Receipt of Disability Payments [Doc. No. 103] are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions in limine filed in the above-captioned case [Doc. Nos. 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 94, 98, 101, 105, 108, and 110], are DENIED.

BY THECOURT,

_________, C.J.

cc: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Craker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-0225 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Craker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CLINTON E. CRAKER and DANA M. CRAKER, Plaintiffs, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-0225 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)