From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc. v. Hill Country Bakery, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Mar 10, 2015
2:15-CV-00034-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)

Opinion

          HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP, Kenneth G. Parker, Christopher B. Maciel, Costa Mesa, California, Attorneys for Defendant Hill Country Bakery, LLC.

          MAIRE BURGEES & DEEDON Patrick L. Deedon, Attorneys for Defendant Austin Freight Systems, Inc.

          CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST, Robert M. Harding, Attorneys for Plaintiff, Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc.


          JOINT MOTION AND STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         WHEREAS, Plaintiff CRAIN WALNUT SHELLING, INC. ("Plaintiff") filed a Complaint in the within action on October 17, 2014;

         WHEREAS, HILL COUNTRY BAKERY, LLC and AUSTIN FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC. (collectively "Defendants") filed Notice of Removal on January 6, 2015, making their response to Plaintiff's initial Complaint due on or before January 13, 2015;

         WHEREAS, the parties agreed that Defendants shall have through and including March 12, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff's initial Complaint;

         WHEREAS, on February 4, 2015, Plaintiff's insurer filed a subrogation action against Defendants, which Defendants removed on March 4, 2015 and which is pending Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. of this Court as Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Co. v. Hill Country Bakery et al., Case No. 2:15-CV-00488-MCE-CMK (the "Subrogation Action");

         WHEREAS, one or more of the parties will file a Notice of Related Case regarding the Subrogation Action;

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to pursue settlement discussion of this action and the Subrogation Action and also to set response dates that are the same dates; and

         WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that both Defendants may have additional time to respond to the initial Complaint to enable the parties to further discuss the merits of their respective claims and defenses and the potential to resolve this action without the need for further litigation;

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and the parties hereby move this Court, as necessary, for an order providing, that Defendants shall have through and including April 3, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff's initial Complaint.

         PROPOSED ORDER

         The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, orders that both Defendants shall have through and including April 3, 2015, to respond to Plaintiff's initial Complaint.


Summaries of

Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc. v. Hill Country Bakery, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Mar 10, 2015
2:15-CV-00034-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc. v. Hill Country Bakery, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CRAIN WALNUT SHELLING, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. HILL…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2015

Citations

2:15-CV-00034-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)