From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Apr 7, 2020
605 S.W.3d 118 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 82890

04-07-2020

Christopher CRAIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

John R. Collom, Kansas City for appellant. Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City for respondent.


John R. Collom, Kansas City for appellant.

Daniel N. McPherson, Jefferson City for respondent.

Before Division Three: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam

Christopher Craig appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after he was convicted of attempted enticement of a child and attempted first-degree statutory rape. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Craig v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Apr 7, 2020
605 S.W.3d 118 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Craig v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher CRAIG, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Apr 7, 2020

Citations

605 S.W.3d 118 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)