From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Singletary

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 15, 1996
101 F.3d 98 (11th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 93-5123.

Decided November 15, 1996.

Paul M. Rashkind, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Miami, FL, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Consuelo S. Maingot, Office of Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

(No. 92-2658-CIV-Ungaro-Benages),

Ursula Ungaro-Benages, Judge.

(Opinion April 19, 1996, 11th Cir., 1996, 80 F.3d 1509)

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, KRAVITCH, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section(s) 46(c).


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Craig v. Singletary

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 15, 1996
101 F.3d 98 (11th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Craig v. Singletary

Case Details

Full title:Donald Lee CRAIG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Secretary…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 15, 1996

Citations

101 F.3d 98 (11th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Craig v. Singletary

We granted rehearing en banc. See Craig v. Singletary, 101 F.3d 98 (1996). For the reasons discussed…