From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Pierson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 10, 2023
2:22-cv-00708 TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00708 TLN-DB

05-10-2023

NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, Plaintiff, v. VERNON R. PIERSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 12, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 12, 2023, (ECF No. 6) are adopted in full.

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Craig v. Pierson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 10, 2023
2:22-cv-00708 TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Craig v. Pierson

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, Plaintiff, v. VERNON R. PIERSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 10, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00708 TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2023)