From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Moore

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 6, 2008
Case Number: 1:07cv67 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 6, 2008)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:07cv67.

February 6, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on December 31, 2007 the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 19). Subsequently, the petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendations (Doc. 20).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.

Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) is DENIED and the Petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Since no reasonable jurist would disagree with the conclusion reached herein, Petitioner is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Craig v. Moore

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Feb 6, 2008
Case Number: 1:07cv67 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Craig v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CRAIG, JR., Petitioner(s), v. ERNIE MOORE, WARDEN, Respondent(s)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Feb 6, 2008

Citations

Case Number: 1:07cv67 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 6, 2008)

Citing Cases

Menefee v. Gray

Under these factual circumstances, it could not be ineffective assistance of counsel for Mr. Menefee's trial…

Menefee v. Gray

Under these factual circumstances, it could not be ineffective assistance of counsel for Mr. Menefee's trial…