From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Meyers

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Oct 19, 2009
C-1-09-31 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 19, 2009)

Opinion

C-1-09-31.

October 19, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 13) to which neither party has objected.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted.

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 13) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 7) is DENIED and this matter is RECOMMITTED to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings according to law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Craig v. Meyers

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Oct 19, 2009
C-1-09-31 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Craig v. Meyers

Case Details

Full title:ALDEN CRAIG, Plaintiff v. MAX A. MEYERS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Oct 19, 2009

Citations

C-1-09-31 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wisdom v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC

ations period, allows recovery not only for that act but also for all acts relating to the same debt and…

James v. MRC Receivables Corp.

When faced with this situation, "The vast majority of federal cases" have found that "[f]or…