From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Am. Honda Motor Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Nov 22, 2021
Civil Action 9:21-CV-043 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:21-CV-043

11-22-2021

SAMMY CRAIG,, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., .


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Michael J.Tmncale United States District Judge

This Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States magistrate judge, for consideration. On October 26, 2021, Judge Stetson issued a Report and Recommendation in which she recommended that the court deny the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss without prejudice and grant the Defendant's Motion to Quash. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the court conducted a de novo review of the magistrate judge's report and the record in this cause. The court agrees with Judge Stetson's recommended disposition. The court therefore ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. 10] is ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Dkt. 7]. Defendant's Motion to Quash is GRANTED. [Dkt. 8]. Plaintiff's first attempt at service is quashed, and Plaintiff is allowed forty-five (45) days to effect proper service of process in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Craig v. Am. Honda Motor Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Nov 22, 2021
Civil Action 9:21-CV-043 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Craig v. Am. Honda Motor Co.

Case Details

Full title:SAMMY CRAIG,, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., .

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Nov 22, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 9:21-CV-043 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2021)

Citing Cases

Newton v. BBVA

“A proper summons contains the correct name of the defendant and is directed to the defendant,” and when the…