From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craig v. Adams

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 21, 2022
2:21-cv-1308 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1308 KJM CKD P

06-21-2022

NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, Petitioner, v. ADAMS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 22, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations issued March 22, 2022 are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is summarily dismissed;
3. This case is closed; and
4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Craig v. Adams

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 21, 2022
2:21-cv-1308 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Craig v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, Petitioner, v. ADAMS, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 21, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-1308 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2022)