From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craft v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 10, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00448-RPM (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00448-RPM

04-10-2013

DEAN CRAFT, Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company seeks dismissal of this civil action on the sole basis that Dean Craft failed to provide notice of the underlying claim made against him in a lawsuit filed against him by an amended complaint on October 15, 2010, until March 21, 2012, after litigation and settlement of the claim. The plaintiff has responded, asserting that the policy coverage was not known to him before March, 2012, and that he should be entitled to show that the insurance company did not suffer any prejudice from the delay in notice. He relies on Friedland v. Travelers Indem. Co.,105 P.3d 639, 642 (Colo. 2005), to avoid dismissal. The Friedland case is not applicable to the policies in this case which are "claims made" policies whereas the Friedland court dealt with an "occurrence" policy. It is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted and this civil action is dismissed with prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

_____________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Craft v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 10, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-cv-00448-RPM (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Craft v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DEAN CRAFT, Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 10, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-00448-RPM (D. Colo. Apr. 10, 2013)