From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craft v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Mar 11, 1964
159 So. 2d 770 (La. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 1003.

January 15, 1964. Rehearing Denied February 6, 1964. Writ Granted March 11, 1964.

Appeal from Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Concordia, Jesse C. Mcgee, judge.

Love Hodges, by Lloyd F. Love, Ferriday, for defendants-appellants.

Falkenheiner Calhoun, by W.C. Falkenheiner, Vidalia, for plaintiff-appellee.

En Banc.


For the reasons set forth in the companion case of Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, 159 So.2d 763, decided this date, the judgment of the district court is amended by reducing the award made to Mrs. Florence K. Craft from the sum of $4,500.00 to the sum of $2,500.00. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against plaintiff.

Amended and affirmed.

TATE, J., dissents and assigns written reasons.

FRUGE J., dissents on quantum and assigns written reasons.

En Banc.


For the reasons more fully stated in the companion case of Ballard v. National Indemnity Co., 159 So.2d 763, the writer dissents from the reduction of the trial court award.


For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska, et al., 159 So.2d 763, I respectfully dissent.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

TATE, J., dissents from denial of rehearing.

FRUGÉ, J., believes a rehearing should be granted.


Summaries of

Craft v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Mar 11, 1964
159 So. 2d 770 (La. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Craft v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Nebraska

Case Details

Full title:MRS. FLORENCE K. CRAFT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 11, 1964

Citations

159 So. 2d 770 (La. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Ballard v. National Indemnity Co.

Hence, the sole question before us is quantum. Consolidated with this suit is a suit arising out of the same…

Winfree v. Consolidated Underwriters

It is my opinion that the trial court did not abuse its great discretion in computing the award. In Ballard…