From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craddock v. Stratus Bldg. Solutions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Feb 1, 2013
Case No. 12-2569-JAR (D. Kan. Feb. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-2569-JAR

02-01-2013

CHASSIDY CRADDOCK, Plaintiff, v. STRATUS BUILDING SOLUTIONS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed on December 18, 2012 (Doc. 21). Fourteen days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) in accordance with the December 18, 2012 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

JULIE A. ROBINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Craddock v. Stratus Bldg. Solutions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Feb 1, 2013
Case No. 12-2569-JAR (D. Kan. Feb. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Craddock v. Stratus Bldg. Solutions

Case Details

Full title:CHASSIDY CRADDOCK, Plaintiff, v. STRATUS BUILDING SOLUTIONS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Feb 1, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-2569-JAR (D. Kan. Feb. 1, 2013)