From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Craddock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 8, 2019
571 S.W.3d 152 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 80966

01-08-2019

Joshua H. CRADDOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Mary Moore, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.


S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Mary Moore, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, P.J., Edward R. Ardini, and Thomas N. Chapman, JJ.

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Joshua Craddock (Craddock) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Craddock alleges that his conviction and sentence based on his guilty plea to one count of assault in the first degree should be vacated due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Craddock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 8, 2019
571 S.W.3d 152 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Craddock v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joshua H. CRADDOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 8, 2019

Citations

571 S.W.3d 152 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)