From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C.R. Legal v. H.P. Capital Invs. Inc. (In re C.R. Legal)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2011
Case No. CV 09-2715-DMG (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 09-2715-DMG

12-06-2011

In re C.R. Legal, Sr., Debtor (BK 09-11150; ADVNo. 09-01121) C.R. Legal, Sr., Appellant v. H.P. Capital Investments, Inc., Appellee


CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE , UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

+-------------------------------+ ¦VALENCIA VALLERY¦NOT REPORTED ¦ +----------------+--------------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk ¦Court Reporter¦ +-------------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s)

None Present

Attorneys Present for Defendant(s)

None Present

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

On October 13, 2011, recognizing the pro se status of appellant C.R. Legal, Sr., this Court granted appellant's request for a 45-day extension of time within which to file his opening brief, requiring appellant to file his opening brief by no later than November 28, 2011.

Appellant, having failed to file his opening brief, is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by December 20, 2011, why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Appellant is advised that failure to file a timely response to this order shall result in the dismissal of this appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

C.R. Legal v. H.P. Capital Invs. Inc. (In re C.R. Legal)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2011
Case No. CV 09-2715-DMG (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2011)
Case details for

C.R. Legal v. H.P. Capital Invs. Inc. (In re C.R. Legal)

Case Details

Full title:In re C.R. Legal, Sr., Debtor (BK 09-11150; ADVNo. 09-01121) C.R. Legal…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 09-2715-DMG (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2011)