From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coyote v. Yellowstone Cnty. Det. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Dec 1, 2020
CV 19-85-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Dec. 1, 2020)

Opinion

CV 19-85-BLG-SPW

12-01-2020

SKY MIGUEL LITTLE COYOTE, SR., Plaintiff, v. YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MONTANA THIRTHEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, and REGION 9 OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations on October 5, 2020. (Doc. 40). The Magistrate recommended that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and failure to name a proper defendant, even after filing several supplements to the Complaint. (Doc. 12 at 2). Furthermore, the Magistrate recommended that, pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, any appeal of the Magistrate's decision would not be taken in good faith.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error.

IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendations entered by the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 40) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter shall be DISMISSED, the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Clerk shall have the docket reflect that any appeal of this decision shall not be taken in good faith, pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

DATED this 1st day of December, 2020.

/s/_________

SUSAN P. WATTERS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Coyote v. Yellowstone Cnty. Det. Facility

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Dec 1, 2020
CV 19-85-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Dec. 1, 2020)
Case details for

Coyote v. Yellowstone Cnty. Det. Facility

Case Details

Full title:SKY MIGUEL LITTLE COYOTE, SR., Plaintiff, v. YELLOWSTONE COUNTY DETENTION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 1, 2020

Citations

CV 19-85-BLG-SPW (D. Mont. Dec. 1, 2020)