Opinion
May 28, 1946.
Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, LEWIS, J.
Arthur Richenthal and Irving M. Moss for appellant.
Leon Finley and David S. Meyer for tenants, respondents.
MEMORANDUM
The fact that the landlord desires to engage in a business similar to that conducted by the tenant does not deprive him of his right to secure possession of the premises where, as in the instant case, he establishes his good faith in seeking such possession for his immediate and personal use.
The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in petition, with costs
EDER and HECHT, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam;
I dissent and vote for affirmance. Order reversed, etc.