From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coyne International Enterprises Corporation v. Taylor

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 31, 2004
Civil Action No. 03-2402 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2004)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-2402.

August 31, 2004


ORDER


AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2004, it is ORDERED that the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Docket No. 31) are amended and paragraphs 18 and 39 of the Conclusions of Law shall read as follows:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

18. Taylor has not violated the reasonable and enforceable provisions of the restrictive covenant, specifically, Taylor has already returned all confidential and proprietary material to Coyne, has not contacted any of Coyne's customers to solicit business for Aramark, has not used any confidential Coyne information, and has not used any Coyne trade secrets.

39. Although some of the provisions in the agreement are reasonable and enforceable, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that Taylor's employment at Aramark in the operations aspect of the business has or will cause Coyne irreparable harm.


Summaries of

Coyne International Enterprises Corporation v. Taylor

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 31, 2004
Civil Action No. 03-2402 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2004)
Case details for

Coyne International Enterprises Corporation v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:COYNE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISES CORPORATION d/b/a COYNE TEXTILE SERVICES…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 31, 2004

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-2402 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2004)