Coyle v. Oberhauser

Full title: John Joseph COYLE, A-235383, 313913, Petitioner-Appellant, v. E.J…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 7, 1971

448 F.2d 787 (9th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 25720.

October 7, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; E. Avery Crary, Judge.

John Joseph Coyle, in pro. per.

Jack K. Weber, Deputy Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Cal., Atty. Gen., William James, Asst. Atty. Gen., John H. Darlington, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges; and BATTIN,^__ District Judge.

__ The Honorable James F. Battin, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The order of the district court denying habeas corpus relief without a hearing is affirmed.

Coyle's main point is foreclosed by United States v. White, 401 U.S. 745, 91 S.Ct. 1122, 28 L.Ed.2d 453 (1971).

We find the point made under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), to be without merit.