From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COX v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORP

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 4, 2008
CV-06-519-TUC-DCB (D. Ariz. Jun. 4, 2008)

Opinion

CV-06-519-TUC-DCB.

June 4, 2008


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Guerin issued her Report and Recommendation on May 19, 2008, recommending that the District Court grant the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was electronically sent to all parties on May 19, 2008, notifying all parties that written objections must be filed within ten days of service. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court.

The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Guerin's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 41) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED and this action is dismissed with prejudice in favor of Defendants. All parties are to bear their own attorney fees and costs. A Final Judgment shall enter separately.


Summaries of

COX v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORP

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 4, 2008
CV-06-519-TUC-DCB (D. Ariz. Jun. 4, 2008)
Case details for

COX v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORP

Case Details

Full title:Ranel Cox, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Yamaha Motor Corp., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 4, 2008

Citations

CV-06-519-TUC-DCB (D. Ariz. Jun. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Peralta v. Worthington Indus.

Plaintiff must be able to produce some reliable evidence of a defect that caused his injury for the Court to…

Hill v. Future Motion Inc.

The elements of a negligence theory differ only in that Plaintiff must also show that First Motion breached…