From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Warden

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 3, 2013
2:04-CV-0065 MCE CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)

Opinion


MICHAEL A. COX, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, Respondent. No. 2:04-CV-0065 MCE CKD United States District Court, E.D. California. December 3, 2013

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         On November 21, 2013, the District Judge adopted this court's April 25, 2012 Findings and Recommendations regarding exhaustion. On December 18, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 24, the undersigned will hold a status and scheduling conference. The parties need not file status conference statements. Because the petition contains both exhausted and unexhausted claims, petitioner's counsel shall be prepared to discuss how petitioner wishes to proceed. Both parties' counsel shall be prepared to discuss scheduling.


Summaries of

Cox v. Warden

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 3, 2013
2:04-CV-0065 MCE CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Cox v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. COX, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 3, 2013

Citations

2:04-CV-0065 MCE CKD (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2013)