From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jul 2, 1996
924 S.W.2d 619 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 69197.

July 2, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, WILLIAM CORRIGAN, J.

S. Paige Canfield, Special Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Cox v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jul 2, 1996
924 S.W.2d 619 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Cox v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILBUR COX, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jul 2, 1996

Citations

924 S.W.2d 619 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)