From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 26, 1930
32 S.W.2d 1109 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

No. 14059.

Delivered November 26, 1930.

Murder — Procedure.

Where the judgment rendered and the sentence pronounced failed to give effect to the provision of the Indeterminate Sentence law, the judgment and sentence will be reformed so as to comply therewith.

Appeal from the District Court of Erath County. Tried below before the Hon. Joe H. Eidson, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for murder; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The opinion states the case.

Oxford Wardlaw of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

In entering judgment and pronouncing sentence the provisions of the Indeterminate Sentence Law were not given effect. The judgment and sentence are reformed in order that it may be shown that appellant is condemned to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than two nor more than five years. As reformed, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

HAWKINS, J., absent.


Summaries of

Cox v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 26, 1930
32 S.W.2d 1109 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Cox v. State

Case Details

Full title:REED COX v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 26, 1930

Citations

32 S.W.2d 1109 (Tex. Crim. App. 1930)
32 S.W.2d 1109