From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 20, 2013
3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC)

03-20-2013

STEVE MICHAEL COX, Plaintiff, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Defendant(s).

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Before the court are plaintiff's motions for Rule 11 sanctions (#s 93, 94, & 95). Plaintiff's motions for Rule 11 sanctions (#s 93, 94, & 95) are without merit and are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ____________________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Cox v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 20, 2013
3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Cox v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:STEVE MICHAEL COX, Plaintiff, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Mar. 20, 2013)