From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 14, 2013
3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC)

02-14-2013

STEVE MICHAEL COX, Plaintiff, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Defendant(s).

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Plaintiff has filed a motion for enlargement of time to complete discovery and motion to compel (#79). Defendants have opposed the motion (#84), and plaintiff has replied (#88).

Plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time to complete discovery and motion to compel (#79) is without merit and is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion is largely unintelligible and irrelevant to the only remaining claim before this court, an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim. If plaintiff wishes to view his medical records he shall follow the standard policy and procedure of the Nevada Department of Corrections to do so.

The parties shall be granted an extension of time to March 8, 2013 to file dispositive motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: _____

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Cox v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 14, 2013
3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Cox v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:STEVE MICHAEL COX, Plaintiff, v. JACK PALMER, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

3:12-CV-0017-RCJ (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 14, 2013)