From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. North

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1217 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1217 GGH P

08-22-2011

ERNEST COX, Plaintiff, v. T. NORTH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. This action is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. Doc. 4. By order filed June 6, 2011, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the June 6, 2011 order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the June 6, 2011, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Cox v. North

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1217 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Cox v. North

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST COX, Plaintiff, v. T. NORTH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1217 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)