From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. McMahon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2013
519 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1284

04-23-2013

ROBERT M. COX; CHERIE M. COX, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JUDY MCMAHON; PAUL GARFINKEL; JOCELYN CATE; GREG FORMAN; DEBORAH LEWIS; STUART FELDMAN; PAUL SCHWARTZ, Defendants - Appellees.

Robert M. Cox, Cherie M. Cox, Appellants Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL) Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert M. Cox, Cherie M. Cox, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert and Cherie Cox appeal the district court's order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. McMahon, No. 2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 14, & 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Cox v. McMahon

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2013
519 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Cox v. McMahon

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT M. COX; CHERIE M. COX, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JUDY MCMAHON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 23, 2013

Citations

519 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2013)