From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

COX v. LOS ANGELES HERALD EXAMINER

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1991
234 Cal.App.3d 1618 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

holding that article was "fair and true" as a matter of law

Summary of this case from Dorsey v. National Enquirer, Inc.

Opinion

1991.


[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 1619 — 1629 CONTAINING COX v. LOS ANGELES HERALD EXAMINER HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]

Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by order dated February 13, 1992.


Summaries of

COX v. LOS ANGELES HERALD EXAMINER

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1991
234 Cal.App.3d 1618 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)

holding that article was "fair and true" as a matter of law

Summary of this case from Dorsey v. National Enquirer, Inc.
Case details for

COX v. LOS ANGELES HERALD EXAMINER

Case Details

Full title:Cox v. Los Angeles Herald Examiner

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1991

Citations

234 Cal.App.3d 1618 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Paramount Communications v. Gibraltar Casualty Co.

In California, in another context, opinions have been stricken from the official reporters. (See, Foreman v.…

Dorsey v. National Enquirer, Inc.

The "fair and true" issue is one of law when "there is no dispute as to what occurred in the judicial…