Opinion
2:20-cv-01792-JCM-BNW
10-20-2022
MICHELLE COX, individually, and as a parent and next friend of M.C., Plaintiffs, v. RYAN LEWIS, individually, and in his official capacity, JORGE PALACIOS, individually, and in his official capacity, and CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendants.
Jason J. Bach, Attorney for Plaintiffs Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Jackie V. Nichols, Clark County School District Office of the General Counsel Crystal J. Herrera, Attorneys for CCSD Defendants
Jason J. Bach, Attorney for Plaintiffs
Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Jackie V. Nichols, Clark County School District Office of the General Counsel Crystal J. Herrera, Attorneys for CCSD Defendants
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CCSD DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST)
The Parties, Plaintiffs Michelle Cox, individually, and as a parent and next friend of M.C., (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, Jason J. Bach, Esq., of The Bach Law Firm, LLC and Defendants Clark County School District (“CCSD”), Ryan Lewis (“Lewis”), and Jorge Palacios (“Palacios”) (collectively “CCSD Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach, and hereby agree and jointly stipulate the following:
1. CCSD Defendants filed its CCSD Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on September 6, 2022 [ECF No. 59];
2. Plaintiffs' Opposition to CCSD Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on October 6, 2022 [ECF No. 66];
3. CCSD Defendants' counsel has a scheduling conflict and is unable to meet the deadline of October 20, 2022 currently scheduled for CCSD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment;
4. The Parties have agreed to a two-week extension for CCSD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment;
5. Accordingly, the deadline for CCSD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, currently due on October 20, 2022, be extended to and including Thursday, November 3, 2022;
6. This is the Parties' first request to extend the deadline to CCSD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; and
7. This Stipulation is being entered in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated this 20th day of October, 2022 Dated this 20th day of October, 2022
THE BACH LAW FIRM, LLC
ORDER
The above Stipulation is hereby GRANTED.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CCSD DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court by using the court's CM/ECF system on the 20th day of October, 2022.
[X] I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.
□ I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days to the following non-CM/ECF participants:
N/A
Krista Busch An employee of Marquis Aurbach