From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. Lewis

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 3, 2022
2:20-cv-01792-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01792-JCM-BNW

11-03-2022

MICHELLE COX, individually, and as a parent and next friend of M.C., Plaintiffs, v. RYAN LEWIS, individually, and in his official capacity, JORGE PALACIOS, individually, and in his official capacity, and CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendants.

THE BACH LAW FIRM, LLC Jason J. Bach, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7984 Attorney for Plaintiffs. MARQUIS AURBACH Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246, Clark County School District Office of the General Counsel Crystal J. Herrera, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12396 Attorneys for CCSD Defendants.


THE BACH LAW FIRM, LLC Jason J. Bach, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7984 Attorney for Plaintiffs.

MARQUIS AURBACH Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246, Clark County School District Office of the General Counsel Crystal J. Herrera, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12396 Attorneys for CCSD Defendants.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CCSD DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(SECOND REQUEST)

The Parties, Plaintiffs Michelle Cox, individually, and as a parent and next friend of M.C., (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, Jason J. Bach, Esq., of The Bach Law Firm, LLC and Defendants Clark County School District (“CCSD”), Ryan Lewis (“Lewis”), and Jorge Palacios (“Palacios”) (collectively “CCSD Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach, and hereby agree and jointly stipulate the following:

1. CCSD Defendants filed its CCSD Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on September 6, 2022 [ECF No. 59];
2. Plaintiffs' Opposition to CCSD Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on October 6, 2022 [ECF No. 66];
3. CCSD Defendants' counsel has been out of the office due to her son's illness and is unable to meet the deadline of November 3, 2022 currently scheduled for CCSD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment;
4. The Parties have agreed to a two-day extension for CCSD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment;
5. Accordingly, the deadline for CCSD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, currently due on November 3, 2022, be extended to and including Monday, November 7, 2022;
6. This is the Parties' second request to extend the deadline to CCSD Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; and
7. This Stipulation is being entered in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The above Stipulation is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cox v. Lewis

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 3, 2022
2:20-cv-01792-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Cox v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE COX, individually, and as a parent and next friend of M.C.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-01792-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Nov. 3, 2022)