From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cox v. LeBlanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 29, 2012
NO.11-386-BAJ-CN (M.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

NO.11-386-BAJ-CN

02-29-2012

WALTER RAY COX, SR. (#514283) v. JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, ET AL


CIVIL ACTION


RULING

The Court, having carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christine Noland dated December 9, 2011 (doc. 33), and plaintiff's objection thereto (doc. 35), hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 20) is granted, dismissed the plaintiff's claims against the moving defendants, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that summary judgment is granted, sua sponte, in favor of defendant Stewart, for reasons stated in the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation. The defendant's motion to dismiss (doc. 19) is denied as moot.

The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims, and this action is hereby dismissed in its entirety.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, February 29, 2012.

__________________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Cox v. LeBlanc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 29, 2012
NO.11-386-BAJ-CN (M.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Cox v. LeBlanc

Case Details

Full title:WALTER RAY COX, SR. (#514283) v. JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

NO.11-386-BAJ-CN (M.D. La. Feb. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Forbes

Mr. Jones also requests that whoever fails the test be required to reimburse the Court for the cost of the…